If there is one word that has been on peoples’ minds lately, it is the word “socialism.” The merits and flaws of socialist policies and economic organization have become a hot topic in recent years with defenders and detractors falling on both sides of the debate. Despite the current spotlight socialism is getting many people may find themselves still confuse: What is socialism? Which countries in the world are socialist countries?
As with many political terms like “conservative”, “liberal”, and “democracy”, the meaning of the term socialism is flexible and can be used to mean different things. This difficulty of defining socialism is compounded by the fact that self-identification of sovereign nations is normally the only criterion by which countries are classified as socialist. As such, although many countries may claim to be socialist, their claims may be disputed and the actual structure of their economy may not reflect socialist ideals. So, answers to the question “which countries are socialist?” can range from “none” to “quite a few” depending on how socialism is understood.
General features of socialism as an ideology can best be understood in contrast to capitalism. Capitalism denotes a political and economic organization where the following are generally true:
- The means of production are mostly privately owned
- People are legally free to buy labor and sell their labor on markets
- Economic production is oriented towards profit rather than need
- Markets play a significant role in determining the distribution of resources and the direction of investments
A political and economic system is normally classified as socialist to the extent that it rejects 1, private ownership of the means of production. Thus, the defining feature of socialism is social or public ownership of the means of production, often via a state apparatus. For example, China is considered socialist because its government owns several key industries and directs the flow of the economy. Socialists disagree on whether rejecting the other 3 features is necessary for an economic system to count as socialist. Market socialists, for instance, think that free enterprise in markets is possible within the context of social ownership of the means of production.
In the context of classifying the political and economic structures of the different nations, the term socialism is often used to refer to two distinct modes of political organization: Marxist-Leninism and Democratic Socialism.
Most self-declared socialist countries through history have been Marxist-Leninist states. The defining feature of Marxists Leninist ideology is the commitment to a two-phase transition from capitalism and socialism. In the first stage, a group of professional revolutionaries drawn from the working class takes control of key governmental industries and operates under a “dictatorship of the proletariat” that establishes policy democratically. The second stage sees the transition from a capitalist economy into a stateless and classless society. i.e. communism. For this reason, states the self declare a Marxist-Leninist ideology are often referred to as communist states. Marxism-Leninism was the official political stance of the USSR and many current communists states trace political influences back to the Soviet Union.
In the modern world, there are currently 5 self-declared communist countries:
- North Korea
Current Marxist-Leninist countries are characterized by a strong central state authority that directs the economy, single party-governance, and private ownership is limited in many if not all aspects. In some communists countries like China and Vietnam, restrictions on private property have been greatly relaxed in recent years and the countries have opened up to the world for trade in global markets.
China has been a self-declared communist state since 1949 when Mao Zedong took control and renamed the country the People’s Republic of China. On paper, China has political parties other than the Communist Party of China, but the power of the ruling communist party makes political opposition virtually non-existent. The official ideology of the Chinese Communist Party is called Maoism, a variant of Marxism-Leninism.
China’s economy is characterized by a strong central government that has control over most of the economy. Since 1949, the majority of Chinese economic enterprises have been state-owned, though economic reformations in the early 21st century have seen the rise of a new burgeoning private industry in the Chinese economy. Specifically, in 2004, the Chinese constitution was modified to recognize private property. In addition to being the world’s most populous country, the Chinese economy is currently the second largest in the world and the fastest growing.
Cuba has been a communist country since 1961 when a revolution led by Fidel Castro overthrew the authoritarian Batista government. During the 1960s, Cuba was a close ally of the USSR, which led to the US and allies placing heavy sanctions on their trade.
The majority of economic enterprises in Cuba are state-owned and the almost 76% of the population is employed by the government. Since the fall of the Soviet Union in the 1990s, Cuba has reformed its economy to allow for worker cooperative and self-employment.
Like most Marxist-Leninist states, Cuba is a one-party state and is ruled by the Cuban Communist Party. Its current president is Raul Castro, who became party leader after Fidel Castro stepped down in 2008.
Laos (Lao People’s Democratic Republic) became a socialist state in 1975. The only legal political party is the Lao People’s Revolutionary Party which hold great political and economic power. Since the 90s, the Laotian government has rolled back many previous restrictions on private property and opening up certain avenues of private industry. Despite being one of the poorest nations in Southeast Asia, as of 2018, Laos has one of the fastest growing economies in the world.
Vietnam was first declared a communist state in 1954 after a partition from the First Indochina War annexed the northern part of the country. At the time, northern Vietnam was communist and supported by the Soviet Union while southern Vietnam was supported by the U.S. After nearly 2 decades of war, North and South Vietnam united and became the modern Socialist Republic of Vietnam.
The Vietnamese economy is directed by the government which owns several key industries. Since the late 20th and early 21st century, economic reforms in Vietnam have relaxed restriction on private markets and it currently has one of the fastest growing economies in the world.
North Korea first became communist following the division of the country into North and South after the end of WWII. In 1948, the Soviet-backed leader Kim-Il-Sung was installed as the head of North Korea.
Interestingly, while most of the world considers it communist, the North Korean government does not consider itself communist, instead being based around Kim Il-Sung’s unique ideology called Juche (self-reliance). Juche as an ideology promotes Korean nationalism, economic independence, and a (possibly cultlike) devotion to the Kim family who has maintained leadership ever since.
In 2009, the country changed its constitution to remove all mentions of Marxism-Leninism and communism, though the ideology of Juche still shares many similarities to Marxist-Leninist ideology.
Democratic socialism is a political ideology and mode of organization that is focused on political democracy along with social ownership of the means of production. Democratic socialism is so named by its adherents as a means to distance the ideology from other socialist ideologies, notably Marxism-Leninism, which are perceived as being non-democratic and authoritarian in nature. Democratic socialist reject the Soviet political model and the highly centralized authoritarian government that characterized several post-USSR communist states. Democratic socialists seek to eventually transition the economy from a capitalist one to a socialist one via governmental action. They seek to extend democracy to the economic sphere.
In practice, classifying countries as democratic socialist is much more ambiguous than Marxist-Leninist countries. This is partly because democratic socialism is a much more pluralistic ideology than classical Marxism-Leninism and its offshoots such as China’s Maoism or North Korea’s Juche ideology. As such, democratic socialists differ with regards to their views on the extent that property is publically or socially owned. Most democratic socialist countries have a mixture of capitalist and socialist policies. The terms “democratic socialism” and “social democracy’ are often used interchangeably, though many argue that the two are distinct ideologies and should not be conflated.
Countries that are often considered democratic socialist or have active democratic socialist political parties include:
- Northern Ireland
Countries classified as democratic socialist tend to have a strong central government that has ownership in key industries in the economy. Unlike Marxism-Leninism, private ownership is generally not restricted in democratic socialist countries, though the state does play a key role in regulating and directing certain industries, such as energy, tech, healthcare, or education. Democratic socialist countries also tend to have expansive social welfare programs. In many of these countries, the expansive social welfare net is a point of political tension. Most countries considered democratic socialist are multi-party states who may or may not have a socialist party currently in control.
In each of these countries, the degree to which private industry is regulated varies greatly. In some European countries like Sweden, there are large privately owned markets but the government owns large stakes in certain industries and heavily regulates the operation of these markets. Other countries, such as Denmark, have free markets but have strong labor protections for the working class that are mean to make things more egalitarian.
The democrats in the us want socialism. People believe that their will be more welfare programs. They have not realized that the freedom is being cut. Our taxes will go up to support the program. If you have studied world history you know that their were slaves all over the world affecting all race, colors. We also know that in European countries they do not pay 25% on taxes but 50%. Thru centuries we have had rich people and because of it they move to other places and it does not affect them. We must be careful in our choice of government and unions, federal laws. We are all ignorant in many ways and people in those countries that are socialist have to guard what they say or a family member will disappear or you will not have able to buy what your family needs. Study research countries, history And you will find your own information do not accept what we hear.
Mankind is a social species by both choice and necessity, but the problem with any governing political ideology as in the ideology of ( Bernie Sanders ), which claims “redistributive justice” is the answer to social equality, is actually contradictory to man’s inherent social character. Human intellectualism, ambition and competition are a few attributes which enable a society to learn and progress freely, without government restraints that are common in Socialism and Communism. Socialism and it’s big brother, Communism, tend to stagnate these attributes in a large portion of a society. When this happens, those who govern begin to seize more control which inevitably leads to more descension among the people. An analysis of the socialist countries listed above will reveal various problems involving stagnation in one or more areas as a direct result of some degree of socialism. Socialism in any form has a propensity to move in the direction of Communism and away from Democracy. The peoples naivety of history enables Socialist and Communist political candidates to convince them that they are missing benefits that these ideologies promise.
You are painting a utopia picture of Capitalism that is just as wrong as those who believe that Communism was going to be a Utopia. You need regulation and social programs along with capitalist elements otherwise the wealth and power becomes concentrated on the top as those with the wealth write all the rules including those that will actually ensure those at the bottom stay at the bottom to eliminate competition that could take away their wealth and power. that is why we have regulations against Monopolies. Also you can protect yourself from the effects of profit above the health of your surroundings. Dump chemicals in the river until it catches fire to make more money that you can use to build walls so you don’t have to see the river on fire. Social programs like education also make sure that those who don’t have wealth to buy opportunities like education are given similar tools in life to then do with what they want which allows for more innovation in society. We need social programs and regulations and checks on capitalism so it doesn’t trample and stifle those that are at the bottom of the rungs.
Tell me… Socialist and communist countries have no rich people? Dictators in those countries are as poor as their citizens? Why Kim Jong is so skinny like the rest of North Korea citizens? Capitalist country encourages innovations – in turn, you make money. Communist countries – you are chosen to work for the area of work.
Under all models, poor still stay poor… that won’t change.