ADVERTISEMENT

Examining Increased Costs Associated With Joint Government Programs

U.S. federal agencies exist to accomplish specific missions; for example, the Department of Defense (DoD) ensures national security, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) explores space. To execute these missions, agencies may develop large, costly systems like aircraft, satellites, or tanks.

To reduce the amount of money spent on these systems, government leaders sometimes establish joint programs so that agencies can collaboratively develop single, shared systems. In theory, joint programs should save the government money because buying one shared system should cost less than buying multiple systems for separate agencies. In practice though, researchers found that joint programs experience larger cost growth than non-joint programs and cautioned government leaders against establishing joint programs in the future. In response, our research explored why joint programs experience cost growth and proposed strategies to prevent those costs.Ā 

ADVERTISEMENT

Many government agencies have used joint programs to produce a diverse set of systems. A famous current joint program is the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter: a Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps collaboration that could have saved over $50B[1] compared to the acquisition of three separate aircraft, but experienced over $150Bin cost growth instead.[2]Ā Although our research focused on a different type of joint programā€”weather prediction satellitesā€”our results are agnostic to agency and system type and can therefore be used to understand and prevent cost growth on any joint program. To generate these results, we studied the acquisition historyā€”from program inception to hardware deliveryā€”of several joint programs and integrated political, organizational, and technical perspectives into our analysis.

This analysis generated our proposed Agency Action Model, a framework grounded in theories of bureaucratic politics, organizations, and systems engineering that explains how costs grow on joint programs. In the model, each collaborating agency is a discrete actor motivated by specific institutional interests. Unlike the private sector, profit does not motivate government agencies; instead, agencies are incentivized to maintain autonomy from other government organizations. This means that agencies value their ability to make decisions independently: a capability that is enabled by large budgets, in-house technical expertise, and unique missions that do not overlap with other agencies.Ā 

Joint programs ā€” which attempt to shrink agency budgets by integrating agenciesā€™ expertise, missions, and decisions ā€” are therefore contrary to agenciesā€™ institutional interests. If directed to form joint programs, agencies will impede collaboration by taking actions to maintain autonomy. Over the lifecycle of a joint program, agency actions form a zero-sum game: as one agency gains autonomy, another loses autonomy and reacts accordingly. If left unchecked, agency actions and reactions will continue indefinitely and turn a joint program into a bureaucratic battlefield.

ADVERTISEMENT

Agency actions increase cost by affecting joint organizations and systems. Anytime agencies act or react, the organizationā€™s structure shifts. Our research illustrated how these structural changes propagate throughout a joint organization ā€” from engineers up through agency administrators ā€” and reduce the efficiency and effectiveness of their decisions. Inefficient decisions increase cost by delaying progress. Ineffective decisions increase cost by sub-optimally trading between cost, schedule, performance, and risk. Ineffective decisions also affect the requirements for and the design of technical systems; for example, cost increases when a joint system is designed to meet the super-set of collaborating agenciesā€™ requirements.Ā 

As summarized above, by linking agency actions to changes in a joint programā€™s organization and system, we were able to explain how collaboration induces cost on joint programs. Armed with this understanding, we suggested that cost growth may be prevented by structuring joint organizations and systems to disincentivize agencies from taking cost-inducing actions.

We proposed that the alignment of agency authority, mission, budget, and expertiseā€”again, from engineers up through agency administratorsā€”provides checks and balances that counter agency incentives and actions. Using these basic principles, we then provided specific guidance for government leaders that wish to establish joint programs in the future. More importantly perhaps, our work also illustrated the value of understanding the relationship between technology, organizations, and bureaucratic politics and how the interactions and relationships between those domains can significantly impact program outcomes.

These findings are described in the article entitled A Model for Understanding and Managing Cost Growth on Joint Programs, recently published in the journal Acta Astronautica. This work was completed by Morgan Dwyer of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Zoe Szjanfarber of the George Washington University, and Bruce Cameron and Edward Crawley of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The views reflected in this article are those of the authorsā€™ and do not reflect those of the Department of Defense or the United States Government.

References

  1. https://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1225.html
  2. https://www.gao.gov/assets/700/692307.pdf

ADVERTISEMENT

Comments

READ THIS NEXT

How To Distinguish A Female Blue Jay Bird From A Male

The only way to tell male fromĀ female blue jays apart from one another is to observe their behavior. You can […]

Is Natural Recovery Of A Tropical Forest In An Anthropogenic Savanna Possible?

Urbanization, timber exploitation, and the need for farmland has led to deforestation in Central Africa. A widespread technique to clear […]

Do Sharks Have Bones?

Sharks do not have bones; instead, they have cartilage that makes up their skeleton. Sharks make some bone material for […]

Difference In Volume Of Exercise Versus Intensity Of Exercise On Physiology And Behavior

Published by Lisa S. Robison Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, 100 Nicolls Road, Stony Brook, NY These findings are […]

Capturing The Complexity Of Geologic Carbon Sequestration In Complex Basalt Formations

Global carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from energy production declined each year between 2013 and 2016, but this trend ended abruptly […]

Temporal mRNA Translation Efficiency Is Encoded In Viral Coding RegionsĀ 

Viruses are small parasites that can only replicate inside the living cells of hosts. A virus is typically composed of […]

What Is PU (Polyurethane) Leather Vs Real Leather

There are different kinds of products referred to as ā€œleather,ā€ but do you know the difference between PU leather (polyurethane […]

Science Trends is a popular source of science news and education around the world. We cover everything from solar power cell technology to climate change to cancer research. We help hundreds of thousands of people every month learn about the world we live in and the latest scientific breakthroughs. Want to know more?