ADVERTISEMENT

Estimating Ground Motions In The Largest Crustal Earthquakes

Earthquakes cause many deaths and injuries worldwide. For example, the 2015 Nepal earthquake is thought to have killed nearly 9,000 people. This event was only one of many events contributing to the 750,000 deaths attributable to earthquakes during the period 1996 to 2015 according to a recent report by the United Nations.

This is a higher total than deaths caused by all other natural disasters (e.g. storms, heatwaves and floods) combined. Earthquakes also cause considerable economic losses. For example, the 2016 Kumamoto (Japan) earthquake is thought to have caused $42 billion-worth of damage according to the Japanese government. The largest earthquakes can also have dramatic and permanent effects on the landscape, e.g. roughly 180km of surface faulting occurred in the 2016 Kaikoura (New Zealand) earthquake.

ADVERTISEMENT

The vast majority of earthquake-related deaths and injuries and economic losses are caused by damage (including total collapse) to buildings or their contents. When designing buildings and infrastructure (e.g. bridges and power plants) to withstand earthquakes, engineers require estimates of the ground motions that their structure could be subjected to in future earthquakes. These estimates are computed by engineering seismologists using two sets of mathematical models.

The first of these provides an assessment of the rate of occurrence of earthquakes of different sizes within a few hundred kilometers of the structure, e.g. how often does a magnitude 6 earthquake occur on a nearby fault? The second model predicts what the ground motion would be given the occurrence of different earthquakes, e.g. if the magnitude 6 earthquake occurred what is the expected ground shaking at the base of the structure? Many hundreds of these so-called ground-motion models have been published.

One of the greatest challenges in developing ground-motion models is a lack of recordings of previous earthquakes, particularly those within the region of interest. This challenge is particularly acute when considering the largest earthquakes because they happen so rarely. Generally, less than one earthquake of magnitude 7.2 or larger occurs in the Earth’s crust every year and is recorded at close distances by modern seismographic networks.

In our recent study, we collected data from 38 crustal earthquakes of magnitudes 7.2 or larger that had occurred worldwide over the past 60 years. Many of these data had been forgotten about and never collated before and hence they had not been used to derive the most recent ground-motion models. Because of its importance for seismic design and since it is often the only information available concerning ground motions in past earthquakes in our study we considered the maximum horizontal acceleration measured from each of the available seismograms. The newly-collated data were compared to predictions from eight ground-motion models that are routinely used to assess the earthquake shaking that a structure may suffer during its lifetime.

ADVERTISEMENT

We found that these eight models provide, on average, a good match to the maximum horizontal accelerations observed in the largest crustal earthquakes. This is reassuring for earthquake engineering. The study, however, did show that the ground motions in some earthquakes (e.g. the 2001 Bhuj earthquake in India) were much higher than those that would be expected given the magnitude.

The data collated for this study will be invaluable for the derivation of new ground-motion models for use in the design of safer structures and consequently for the reduction of earthquake risk.

The study, Peak ground accelerations from large (M ≥ 7.2) shallow crustal earthquakes: a comparison with predictions from eight recent ground-motion models was recently published in the Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

Comment (1)

  1. Its not just ground motions, but human error. Such as poor enforcement of building codes, corrupt practices, failing to speak up, which are all just as important as a scientifically great and strong but ultimately useless building code which is blatantly ignored. Look no further than Mexico City 2017, Nepal 2015, Tainan 2016…

Leave a Reply to Ju Cancel reply

READ THIS NEXT

Geothermal Energy Pros And Cons

Geothermal energy has several pros and cons which make it an ideal energy source for specific regions. Geothermal energy pros […]

Creating Artificial Life: Choosing The Right Container

All of us, at some point in our lives, have pondered the perplexing notion of life: What does it mean […]

An Analysis Of The Unique Timbre Of The Portuguese Guitar

The Portuguese guitar is a specific type of guitar which was developed in Portugal during the last centuries, directly descending […]

Fuzzy Model Of Residential Energy Decision-Making: Considering Behavioral Economic Concepts

As residential buildings can account for up to 50% of the total energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in […]

Smoking Pot Does Not Make You Stupid (Birdbrained)

Common beliefs say smoking pot may lower your IQ. A study in twins now contradicts this: Intelligence is suffering from […]

Researchers Use Gene Editing To Remove Fatal Blood Disorder From Embryo

It would be an understatement to say that there are many diseases that humans are facing every day. Some of […]

Nitric Oxide And Hydrogen Sulfide Cross-Talk For Blood Vessel Wellness

The importance of the gaseous transmitter nitric oxide (NO) was definitely recognized by the 1998 Nobel Prize for Medicine/Physiology. Depending […]

Science Trends is a popular source of science news and education around the world. We cover everything from solar power cell technology to climate change to cancer research. We help hundreds of thousands of people every month learn about the world we live in and the latest scientific breakthroughs. Want to know more?