The Role Of Aeration In Floating Treatment Wetlands

Water availability and supply dynamics are issues of great concern to society. Water quality also influences water availability dynamics because we want to ensure the water we have is clean and safe for use or reuse. Water quality has been in the spotlight recently because of incidents in Flint, MI, and city-wide boil notices in prominent cities such as Austin, TX, and Atlanta, GA. Large scale algal blooms, like those in the coastal waters of Florida, the Chesapeake Bay, and Lake Erie, can cause a cascade of negative environmental impacts, from decreased oxygen availability within the water to large scale fish kills. Algal blooms are directly linked to the amount of nutrients, specifically nitrogen and phosphorus, found within the water. Therefore, regulate or remove the nutrients; stop the algal blooms; increase water quality.

Constructed wetlands are one solution to mitigate the nutrient pollution of our waterways; they work by mimicking the natural filtration and cleansing properties of naturally occurring wetlands. In particular, floating treatment wetlands (FTWs) are a promising type of constructed wetlands for nutrient remediation within water bodies. Floating treatment wetlands are modeled on naturally floating reed beds that break away from the shoreline. These systems employ a buoyant structure, such as a mat or raft, to support plant life, with the vegetative shoot of the plant suspended above the water line and the roots exposed directly to the water. For those familiar with hydroponics, the concept is similar. By allowing roots access directly to the water, the plants work to remove excess nitrogen and phosphorus during their natural growth processes.

FTWs have been deployed in many different water systems, from harbors to rivers, lakes, and in retention ponds. Previous research has shown other types of constructed wetlands have benefited from the addition of aeration to the water source, promoting water mixing, plant growth and nutrient uptake (Bowmer, 1987; Maltais-Landry et al., 2007, 2009; Zhang et al., 2010). However, FTWs function very differently from other constructed wetlands due to the lack of soil or substrate. Would the addition of aeration in FTW systems prove to be beneficial? What if the local community wanted to add a water fountain to the retention pond? Would it hurt the efficacy of the FTWs?

To better understand why aeration is actually a big deal, there is this little natural system called the nitrogen cycle. Remember it? Cows poop. Poop is broken down and becomes ammonium. Ammonium is transformed into nitrite. Nitrite becomes nitrate. Plants take up nitrate. Cows eat plants. What is important about this system is that the transformation from ammonium to nitrite and from nitrite to nitrate is performed solely by nitrifying bacteria. To survive, these bacteria require oxygen to be present in the water, called aerobic conditions. If oxygen levels drop too low, the system is considered anaerobic (without oxygen) and the nitrogen cycle shifts into producing nitrogen gas instead. Nitrogen gas is released into the atmosphere and is not consumable by plants, reducing access to nitrogen by the plants.

Image courtesy Sarah White and Lauren Garcia Chance

For our study, we exposed one set of FTWs to an aquarium bubbler to introduce oxygen into the system, while in the other FTW set we provided no additional source of oxygen. In the absence of aeration, oxygen levels were maintained above 2 mg/L, but when aerated, the average oxygen level was above 7 mg/L. Despite differences in oxygen concentrations between non-aerated and aerated systems, the concentration of oxygen in non-aerated systems never declined to <1 mg/L or, in other words, never became anaerobic. While reaching anaerobic conditions is possible in other forms of constructed wetlands (Butterworth et al., 2013; Fan et al., 2013), FTWs permit gas exchange across the water surface and maintain acceptable aeration levels for nitrification processes without additional artificial aeration.

In other studies, the addition of aeration has helped constructed wetlands to remain aerobic and therefore increased the production of nitrate, which the plants can then take up and remove from the water. We found similar results when using FTWs; plants exposed to aeration had a greater amount of nitrogen within the plant tissues compared to those with no aeration. However, when looking at overall remediation of nutrients within the water column, a different story emerged; the non-aerated systems were actually more efficient at removing nitrogen. So, if the non-aerated systems were removing more nitrogen than the aerated, but less nitrogen was ending up in the plants, where was it going?

Following a period of head scratching, we returned to the data and found two plausible reasons. The first solution is straight forward, weeds. While we tried to remove and prevent weeds from growing on our FTWs, as any gardener knows, sometimes you lose the battle. By assessing the number of weeds and level of nutrients contained within the weeds, we found that we had higher weed presence in the non-aerated FTWs which contributed some minor fraction of nitrogen removal from the system. However, this was accounting only for those weeds that survived our killing gauntlet. Weeds removed throughout the experiment would have also accounted for some level of nitrogen removal from the system as well.

The second reason is linked to dissolved organic carbon (DOC) or the amount of carbon available within the system. Contributors to DOC could include decaying organic matter, algae, and metabolites released from plant roots systems. When assessing the amount of DOC in each system, aerated and non-aerated, we found that the non-aerated systems had 30% more DOC than the aerated systems. This is important because DOC can function as a nutrient sink, meaning nitrogen would be sorbed by this organic matter and removed from the water column. Furthermore, high DOC can actually work to encourage denitrification processes despite not reaching anaerobic conditions. Therefore, nitrogen loss from the non-aerated systems could be in the form of nitrogen gas, despite the high oxygen levels.

Ultimately, it seems FTWs are effective under both aerated and non-aerated conditions. However, the form of removal of nitrogen from the system varies, with system plant removal as the main process for aerated systems and weeds, DOC sorption, and possible release of nitrogen gas as the main processes in non-aerated conditions. Both systems help to increase water quality and help ensure a future in which clean surface water is a possibility.

These findings are described in the article entitled Aeration and plant coverage influence floating treatment wetland remediation efficacy, recently published in the journal Ecological Engineering.

About The Author

Lauren Garcia Chance

Lauren Garcia Chance is a PhD Student at Clemson University studying Plant Science and Environmental Toxicology.

Sarah A. White

Sarah White is an associate professor of horticulture at Clemson University, where she develops plant-based remediation technologies to cleanse water for reuse by agricultural operations and to protect our water resources. Specialties: Remediation science, constructed wetlands, floating treatment wetlands, vegetated buffers, nutrient remediation, pathogen remediation.

Speak Your Mind!


Attentional Control Brain-Behavioral Relationships In Anxiety And Depression

On a daily basis, many of us are bombarded by emotionally-charged information such as news headlines, social media posts, and the various facial expressions we encounter that convey potent cues about our surroundings. Negative information is especially attention-grabbing and, therefore, difficult to ignore even when carrying out an unrelated activity, for example, trying to read […]

“Ripples” Of Hippocampal Activity Help Consolidate Memories During Sleep

By now, it is commonly accepted in the scientific community that sleep is a necessary part of memory formation and consolidation. Over a century of clinical investigations has shown that sleep helps benefit the retention of memories and that sleep deprivation can negatively affect memory retention. Though these connections between sleep and memory have been known […]

Energy Harvesting Tiles Could Transform Footsteps Into Power

Harvesting energy from pedestrians could be used to power sensors in smart infrastructure, monitor structural health, and provide environmental sensing data. Energy harvesting tiles have potential applications in high-volume pedestrian paths and areas, such as sporting arenas, airports, railway stations, shopping malls, offices, and apartment blocks. However, most of the current research on energy harvesting […]

Encircling Cities From Rural Areas? Barriers To The Diffusion Of Solar Water Heaters In China’s Urban Market

Solar thermal heating is a comparatively low-tech and low-cost renewable energy technology, but its contribution to global green energy is much higher than the eye-catching solar PV, which is often ignored in many countries’ renewable energy policies. In fact, these cheaper but “good enough” low-tech innovations are also of great significance in addressing global climate […]

Sexual Assault Risks In The US Military: Deployed Vs. Non-deployed Service Women

Unprecedented numbers of women have been deployed to combat zones in Iraq/Afghanistan following 9/11 and servicewomen now comprise approximately 16% of United States active duty and 19% of Reserve/National Guard troops. Since 1990, approximately one in four servicewomen report combat experiences. Even when combat is considered, sexual violence is, unfortunately, one of the greatest health […]

Policies And Market Uncertainty: Exploring The Impact On Renewables Adoption

There is a wide international consensus on the need to limit global warming. This is evident from the 195 countries who have adopted a binding agreement on global climate change in December 2015, known as the Paris Agreement. Governments have to implement a wide set of policy tools to curb emissions and also to mitigate […]

Teddy Bear Hamster: Lifespan And Characteristics

Teddy bear hamsters are incredibly cute and make great pets,  the common name for what’s known as the Syrian hamster. The average lifespan of a teddy bear hamster is about 2-3 years in captivity, and less time in the wild. Individual hamster can live shorter or longer depending on their lifestyle, diet, and care. The […]