Harnessing The Elements To Feed Microbes

The vast majority of fuels and chemicals used by humans are made from fossil carbon. Bioproduction from microorganisms, such as bacteria or yeast, might provide a way to wean us from our dependence on these unsustainable sources. In fact, microbes are already cultured at a huge scale across the planet – think breweries – and have been handled and processed by experts for centuries. Yet, in order to grow and produce a chemical of interest, microbes must be supplied with a suitable feedstock. What can we afford to feed them?

In recent years, the use of sugars as feedstock in biofactories has dramatically expanded. However, as the use of sugars for bioproduction increases, we begin to witness its drawbacks. First, sugar used by microbial biofactories cannot be used for food or feed. As our nutritional requirements continue to expand, diverting agricultural resources towards bioproduction become less sustainable and could severely decrease food security. Moreover, expanding agricultural land use for the sake of bioproduction reduces natural habitats and biodiversity and burdens the environment.


Alternative feedstocks, which do not compete with agricultural production, have been suggested, for example, lignocellulosic and algal biomass. However, the processing of these feedstocks is very challenging, necessitating costly and inefficient conversion methods. Even more important, the efficiency by which plants and algae intercept light and convert it into to biomass is very low, casting doubt on the very basic idea of harnessing this natural process to feed microbial bioproduction.

So what is the alternative? An ideal microbial feedstock would be directly derived from almost unlimited resources, fully available in the environment. To put it more poetically, we want to derive bioproduction from the “elements” of nature: air – from which we take carbon dioxide as a direct carbon source; water – which supplies the hydrogen equivalent; fire – the renewable energy, e.g., solar and wind, that provides the necessary driving force; and earth – representing the minerals, i.e., other elements, that are needed for microbial growth.

How do we feed these “elements” to microbes? In a recent paper, we investigated and compared different approaches to provide microbes with the carbon and energy they need for growth. From a point of view of energy, electricity provides a great starting point. While solar energy can be directly used to energize chemical processes, its conversion to electricity provides highly-needed flexibility. That is, when the sun doesn’t shine, the wind blows to drive turbines. If both are not available, hydro- or geo-energy could come to the rescue. Hence, by tapping into electricity as an energy source, we tap into a myriad of different renewable sources without being completely dependent on any.

Electricity can be used to transfer hydrogen equivalent from water to a chemical carrier. Microbes can then take the hydrogen equivalent from the carrier and use it to convert carbon dioxide into biomass and products. Several inorganic compounds, such as ions of iron or nitrate, can serve as such carriers. An even better approach is to use electricity to transfer hydrogen equivalent from water directly into carbon dioxide. The resulting reduced organic compound can be used as a microbial feedstock, “carrying” with it three of the required elements: carbon, hydrogen equivalent, and energy.


In our analysis, we show that carbon monoxide and formic acid, both one-carbon molecules, can serve as ideal intermediates between the former, chemical process, and the latter, biological conversion. However, while carbon monoxide is a toxic, flammable gas with low solubility, formic acid is completely soluble and easy to handle and transport. This makes formic acid an especially promising feedstock for bioproduction. Together, we envision a production chain which harnesses the advantages of each field: physicochemical processes support fast and efficient conversions of renewable energy into electricity and of carbon dioxide into formic acid, while biological processes are effective in converting this latter simple feedstock into a wide array of complex products.

It will take some time before we can fully implement this vision. Apart from further improvements in electrochemical processes, in order for the production chain to reach its full potential, we need to design and engineer better metabolic solutions for microbial growth on formic acid. While multiple microbes can grow on formic acid as sole carbon and energy source, most of the metabolic routes they employ for this growth are either limited in efficiency or are restricted to extreme conditions.

One of the main goals of our lab is to use engineering-like tools to design and implement novel metabolic routes that would support bioconversion of formic acid at very high efficiency and under non-extreme conditions. We are specifically working on engineering model microbes, widely used in the biotechnological industry for bioproduction processes, to grow on formic acid using the most efficient pathway we have designed so far: the reductive glycine pathway. Upon completion, these engineered microbes could pave the way for sustainable bioproduction of value-added chemicals from renewably-produced formic acid, and thus transform the way we produce our everyday commodities.

These findings are described in the article entitled, Towards sustainable feedstocks: A guide to electron donors for microbial carbon fixation, recently published in the journal Current Opinion in Biotechnology.

This work was funded by the European Commision and is part of the EU consortium project called eForFuel. The work was conducted by Nico Joannes Claassens and Arren Bar-Even from the Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, and Irene Sánchez-Andrea and Diana Zita Sousa from Wageningen University. This research




Accurate Evaluation Of Internal Energy, Free Energy, Entropy, And Enthalpy Of Non-Polar Molecules Using Virial Coefficients

The theoretical assessments of thermodynamic quantities are of great significance for the accurate prediction of the many chemical processes, optimizing […]

Machine-To-Machine Communication: Challenges And Future Opportunities

With the advent of machine-to-machine communication, the autonomous communication of smart devices will likely be a part of the human ecosystem/society in […]

Caged Hydrocarbons Hidden For Half A Century: Could Ethanoadamantanes Prove To Be Useful Molecular Indicators?

Hydrocarbons come in many shapes and sizes. Probably the most intriguing of these is caged structures. Some of these resemble […]

Can Material Found In Nature Provide Effective Treatments For Acid Drainage?

Acid drainage (AD) refers to the effluent from mining, metallurgy, and various other industrial operations, including tanneries, electroplating, power plants, […]

Biofuels Pros And Cons

The biofuel pros and cons are can be summarized into, renewable, self-sustaining, low cost and sovereignty for biofuels pros and water […]

Organoids Reproduce Metabolic Alterations Of Colorectal Cancer: A Good Tool To Choose The Best Drug Based On Tumor Stage

Colorectal cancer is considered to be one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers and it also has one of the […]

Non-Communicable Diseases Emerging As A Real Enemy In Uganda? Doctors From Makerere University And Yale University Shed More Light

One of the worst and most devastating outcomes of any treatment is death. Although death is inevitable, a lot can […]

Science Trends is a popular source of science news and education around the world. We cover everything from solar power cell technology to climate change to cancer research. We help hundreds of thousands of people every month learn about the world we live in and the latest scientific breakthroughs. Want to know more?