Pluto Should Have Never Been Downgraded From A Planet, Some Scientists Claim

A new study claims that everyone’s favorite tiny planet, Pluto, should have never been classified as dwarf planet over a decade ago. As many of you might remember, 12 years ago in 2006 Pluto had its planet credentials yanked and had a “dwarf planet” sticker slapped on it by the Internation Astronomical Union (IAU), upsetting quite a few people (something that a lot of people have yet to get over to this day). The IAU is a group that names planetary bodies and they get to decide and creates rules that define what is (and isn’t) a planet. In 2006 the IAU defined a planet (which can be found on their website here):

A planet is a celestial body that (a) is in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape, and (c) has cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit

Pluto (a) does orbit the sun, (b) is round or has a nearly round shape, but it is that final criterion that got Pluto knocked off the list for being a planet. The IAU claimed that Pluto was simply too small to clear its neighborhood and knock debris and space rocks out of its path as it orbits the sun. But some scientists are now fighting back saying that reason doesn’t hold any weight to strip Pluto of its “planet card”.

The study (which can be found here), published in the scientific journal Icarus, delves into the scientific aspect of what a planet is and how science should classify a planet. Planetary scientist Philip Metzger from the University of Central Florida was the lead author on this study and he has had some serious issues with the IAU classifying Pluto as a dwarf planet. Metzger and his research team looked at centuries’ worth of research and found that the IAU based their criteria for the “clear the neighborhood around its orbit” from one source from the early 19th century.

They also found that the IAU did not take into account that in the 1950’s the standards for classifying planets changed thanks to Gerald Kuiper (the Kuiper belt that he discovered is named after him). Kuiper, who is considered to be the father of modern planetary science, believed that what determined whether something was or wasn’t a planet was how a celestial body actually formed. If the IAU used that as a standard then Pluto would still be a planet (more than likely). Metzger actually proposes in his research that a celestial body should be classified as a planet if it has enough gravity to be spherical in shape. He states, “It turns out this is an important milestone in the evolution of a planetary body, because apparently when it happens, it initiates active geology in the body.”

The idea of one governing body being able to vote to decide on whether or not a planet is a planet is also brought up in Metzger’s research. He does state that ultimately it needs to be scientists who decide whether or not a planet is a planet based on scientific evidence, not made by people based purely on a vote.

Here is some information about the planet Pluto:

• Orbital period: 248 Earth years = 1 full year on Pluto
• Pluto has 5 moons (largest is Charon)
• Was discovered on February 18, 1930, by Clyde Tombaugh in the Lowell Observatory
• Pluto is named after the Greek god of the underworld (Pluto is another name for Hades)
• Pluto was reclassified as a dwarf planet in 2006)
• Pluto is the largest dwarf planet in our solar system (we have 5 dwarf planets in our solar system)

The Other Planets In Our Solar System

I wanted to be a snowplow driver when I was a kid. Growing up in the Rocky Mountains, that’s the most glorious job you can imagine. But then my mother took me to a lecture about the solar system when I was 8, and I got hooked. Kip Thorne

If you are curious about the other planets in our solar system, we created a table below that covered the basics of the solar system (not including Pluto since we covered that already).